Qualification
This
has become a very important step of late. The problem with
getting all the resumes that we referenced in Attraction,
is that a lot of them are either no good, or they are outright
lies. For this reason, recruiters are now increasingly utilizing
testing as a means by which they can screen and prioritize
applicants before investing valuable time tracking them down
and talking to them.
The
most frequently used testing programs are in IT skills since
that continues to be the area of the economy that suffers
the greatest shortfall of talent, and lends itself to the
greatest degree of abuse. There are different types of tests,
including online, offline, and even proctored at the company's
offices. Clearly, online testing is the most desirable because
it is highly scalable, and allows the screening to happen
at arms length. The concern with online testing is that it
seems open to cheating, since you can't really know who has
taken the test on the other end.
There
are a few companies competing in the online IT testing arena
in the U.S. but the one that seems to have solved the question
best is one called ReviewNet. After getting a candidates test
results, you can bring that person into your office and have
not only the questions that he answered, but his results,
the time it took for him to answer, and the explanation for
each of these answers on your computer screen. So, if the
candidate had his brother answering the questions for him,
he will be in a bit of a predicament when the recruiter says
"I notice you answered this particular question very
quickly and accurately. Please explain your thinking behind
that answer." Candidates are notified that this is the
process, resulting in an effective deterrent to cheating.
Typically,
a company will purchase a block of these tests and will administer
them to candidates that look good after first reviewing their
resume, and perhaps speaking on the phone.
Another
form of preliminary testing that is catching on is personality
testing. A 1999 survey of 1054 human resource managers conducted
by the American Management Association shows that 44 percent
used personality testing to select employees. This doesn't
include companies that use less-orthodox methods of gauging
personalities such as handwriting analysis or astrological
charts.
For
U.S. based recruiters, there are of course, several words
of caution to be applied for preliminary testing. Namely,
in our heavily regulated employment environment, using these
as definitive de-selection criteria can be used against the
employer in a discrimination lawsuit. Even with those risks,
though, these tests are increasing in popularity.
I
would be remiss if I did not mention that a crucial step is
being taken toward solving the qualification (and the ocean
of resumes) problem, not in the U.S., but right here in India.
One of the key, unique components of CareerMosaic India is
that it will allow employers to integrate a quick 10 minute
skills test in the middle of the "Apply for this Job"
process that the candidate is prompted into. I believe that
this is the first time this is being done real time, integrated
into a major job board, and expect that it will result in
both a decreased volume of resumes, and an increase in quality
and targetability. I will leave the in depth explanation of
this system to the staff at CareerMosaic India, but it is
truly an innovation that should deliver much value to its
users.
Archives
Top